THE TRUE UMBRELLA VS. EXCESS LIABILITY POLICY
Umbrella and Excess Liability coverages are not standardized
as is typically true with the underlying coverage forms offered
by most insurance companies. Without a standardized form,
the coverage specifics will vary from carrier to carrier and
sometimes even from year to year, depending on whatever coverage
amendments have been decided on by a given company. In the
general context of non-standardized forms, the following should
illustrate some of the more probable differences in these
two coverage approaches.
Fundamentally, a straight "Excess Liability" policy is distinguished
from an "Umbrella" policy in that the Umbrella policy affords
broad blanket excess liability coverage and applies to certain
areas that are not covered by underlying policies. Generally,
Excess Liability coverage is not broader than the underlying
primary coverage and may be even more restrictive depending
on the specific insuring agreements, exclusions, conditions,
etc.
Excess Liability coverage may be provided by either a "stand
alone" form or a "following" form. A "stand alone" policy
relies exclusively on its own policy terms, conditions, and
exclusions. The "following" form policy literally honors the
specific terms of the underlying coverages it supplements.
One of the outstanding features of the true Umbrella
policy is the fact that its coverages go beyond the scope
of the underlying coverage, thereby giving the insured
coverage in many instances where there would be no primary
coverage at all! In some Umbrella policies this broadened
coverage is subject to a self insured retention (SIR), usually
varying anywhere from nothing to $25,000 per claim depending
on the policy.
Some more specific coverage features that should be considered
when weighing Excess Liability versus true Umbrella coverage
are discussed below. Again, not all of the following features
are unique to one form or the other -- depending on the specific
insurance company involved and the current form being used
there could be a mix of the following points -- but they are
important nonetheless.
- Does the insurance company "pay on behalf of" or does
it "indemnify"? Typically an "indemnify" policy requires
that the insured first pay for defense and judgment with
later reimbursement by the company.
- What is the insurance company's obligation to provide
defense coverage? Will the policy pay defense costs
in addition to its limits, or as part of its limits?
Some Excess Liability policies provide no defense benefits
-- just their limits applicable to a judgment or agreed
settlement. Furthermore,
this can lead to severe coverage gaps as respects defense
costs.
- How extensive is the coverage definition of "personal
injury"? Many Umbrella policies give a very broad definition
of personal injury, which may include mental anguish, shock,
mental injury, discrimination, and/or humiliation. Imagine
what could happen with a claim if you had an Excess Liability
policy and it did not grant coverage to this extent! In
the case of Condominium insurance, unit owners would probably
sue the condominium board of directors for the uninsured
loss!
- What is the policy territory? Most Excess Liability
policies limit coverage to only the United States and Canada.
True Umbrella coverage typically extends coverage to anywhere
in the world.
- What is the contractual liability? Does the policy
demand that the contract be in writing, or will coverage
be granted for oral agreements?
- Is there a fellow employee exclusion? Many Excess
Liability policies have an exclusion that typically reads
as follows:
This policy does not apply to claims against any employee
with respect to personal injury or death of another employee
of the same employer injured in the course of such employment.
A well-written Umbrella policy will not have this exclusion.
- Is there an additional insured coverage extension?
Frequently contracts demand that others be added to a policy
as additional insureds (e.g., contractors, lifeguards, real
estate managers, etc.) A true Umbrella policy will grant
this extension automatically without additional cost. An
Excess Liability policy normally won't extend to additional
insureds unless you specifically declare the additional
exposure, endorse the policy, and pay the extra premium.
- What are the policy's cancellation specifications?
Some Excess Liability policies are automatically terminated
if the underlying coverage is canceled or non-renewed. Furthermore,
the Excess Liability carrier often imposes a stringent requirement
to notify of any material change in premium or coverage
within the underlying policies. Failures to discharge this
obligation could result in coverage difficulties. Again,
a well-written Umbrella policy will either not impose these
requirements or, if they are imposed, they are usually less
stringent.
Based on our experience, the most common advantage in selecting
an Excess Liability policy is lower premium. Even if these savings
are substantial, however, the insured may find this decision
proves to be penny wise and pound foolish.
Additionally, many underwriters will only offer Excess Liability
coverage on what they consider a "troubled risk." They simply
don't want to be too generous in granting broad coverage when
they suspect there may be any problem.
|